The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1348•Andrea G. Briggs v. ELEVATOR CONTROL CORPORATION (El Con)
03-1348Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 24, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1348
ANDREA G. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ELEVATOR CONTROL CORPORATION (El Con); GORDON
R. ENGLAND, Secretary of the Navy; JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
01-1213-CCB)
Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 24, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrea G. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Warren D. Stephens, Samuel J.
DeBlasis, II, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS,
L.L.P., Lanham, Maryland; Roann Nichols, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrea G. Briggs appeals the district court’s orders granting
Respondents’ motions for summary judgment in her negligence action.
We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Briggs v. Elevator Control Corp., No. CA-01-1213-CCB
(D. Md. Feb. 26, 2002 and Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.