United States of America v. Richard Charles Norton

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1336
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD CHARLES NORTON,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
CYNTHIA K. NORTON,
Claimant.
No. 03-1394
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD CHARLES NORTON,
Defendant - Appellant,
and
CYNTHIA K. NORTON,
Claimant.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (CR-99-78)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Charles Norton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Sharon Burham, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Richard Charles Norton appeals the district court’s order
denying is motion for an evidentiary hearing and a subsequent order
entering a stay of judgment pending appeal. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Norton,
No. 99-78 (W.D. Va. Jan. 31, 2003 & Mar. 21, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --