The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1273•Jeffrey Thomas Farmer v. University of North Carolina, at Chapel Hill
03-1273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1273
JEFFREY THOMAS FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, at Chapel Hill,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-03-103-H)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint alleging violations of the Americans with
Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act for failing to state a
claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Farmer v. University of
North Carolina, No. CA-03-103-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 20, 2003). We deny
Farmer’s motions to expedite the appeal and to seal forwarded
documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.