Cynthia Critchfield v. U.s. Drug Enforcement Agency

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1260
CYNTHIA CRITCHFIELD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
DATATRAC INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1456-A)
Submitted: October 29, 2003 Decided: December 12, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert R. Weed, THE LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. WEED, Sterling,
Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,
Gerard J. Mene, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Cynthia Critchfield appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint against the United States Drug Enforcement
Agency arising out of the DEA’s failure to provide Critchfield with
a security clearance or permit her to begin work for its
contractor, Datatrec Information Services, prior to issuance of a
security clearance. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Critchfield v. U.S. Drug Enforcement
Agency, No. CA-02-1456-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 28, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --