The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1245•Martin Francisco Salazar v. SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of the Department of Energy
03-1245Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 22, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1245
MARTIN FRANCISCO SALAZAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SPENCER ABRAHAM, Secretary of the Department
of Energy,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.
(CA-01-3209-1-23)
Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martin Francisco Salazar, Appellant Pro Se. Terri Hearn Bailey,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Martin Francisco Salazar appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to compel and granting Defendant’s motion for
summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Salazar
v. Abraham, No. CA-01-3209-1-23 (D.S.C. filed Feb. 4, 2003; entered
Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.