The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1203•Donald Van Meter v. Katherine Van Meter
03-1203Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 24, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1203
DONALD VAN METER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KATHERINE VAN METER; BARBARA GREIG,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-03-104)
Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 24, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Van Meter, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Van Meter appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Van Meter v.
Van Meter, No. CA-03-104 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 31, 2003; entered
Feb. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.