David L. Whitehead v. Viacom, Incorporated

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1148
DAVID L. WHITEHEAD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
VIACOM, INCORPORATED; DOES 1-50, Unnamed,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
02-1899-DKC)
Submitted: April 30, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David L. Whitehead, Appellant Pro Se. Paul R. Taskier, DICKSTEIN,
SHAPIRO, MORIN & OSHINSKY, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David L. Whitehead appeals from the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil action and denying his motion for recusal. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Whitehead v. Viacom, Inc., No. CA-02-1899-DKC (D. Md. Nov. 15,
2002; Dec. 31, 2002). We deny Whitehead’s motions for an
evidentiary hearing, for injunctive relief, and to strike the
Appellee’s informal brief, and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --