The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1147•Terri Baker v. Greyhound Bus Line
03-1147Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1147
TERRI BAKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GREYHOUND BUS LINE; RAY ROBINSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. (CA-
02-3239-JFM)
Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 20, 2003
Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terri Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Karla Grossenbacher, Emily R.
Friedman, SEYFARTH SHAW, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Terri Baker appeals the district court’s order denying her
suit alleging discrimination based on race and disability. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Baker v.
Greyhound Bus Line, No. CA-02-3239-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 14, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.