The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1132•Kimberly T. Cooper v. the City of Roanoke, Virginia
03-1132Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1132
KIMBERLY T. COOPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA; MICHAEL
WASHINGTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-673-7)
Submitted: July 31, 2003 Decided: September 2, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John P. Fishwick, Jr., LICHTENSTEIN, FISHWICK & JOHNSON, P.L.C.,
Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. William M. Hackworth, Elizabeth
K. Dillon, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE CITY OF ROANOKE, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kimberly T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order entering
summary judgment for Defendants in this Title VII action alleging
a sexually hostile work environment. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Cooper v. City of
Roanoke, No. CA-02-673-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2003). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.