Stephen Akin Molajoye v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 1992 . Accordingly, we deny the

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1080
STEPHEN AKIN MOLAJOYE,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A29-625-532)
Submitted: July 22, 2003 Decided: August 12, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER, Silver Spring, Maryland,
for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Earle
B. Wilson, Senior Litigation Counsel, Leslie M. McKay, Office of
Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Akin Molajoye, a native and citizen of Nigeria,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen and for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the administrative record and the
Board’s order and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion
in denying Molajoye’s motion to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)
(2003); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24 (1992). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review on the reasoning of the Board. See
In re: Molajoye, No. A29-625-532 (B.I.A. Dec. 16, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --