The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1074•Mesita L. Love v. John E. Potter, in his capacity as Postmaster General
03-1074Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 1, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1074
MESITA L. LOVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER, in his capacity as Postmaster
General,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-02-498)
Submitted: March 31, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mesita L. Love, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Christopher John
Burton, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mesita L. Love appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging employment
discrimination based on gender, race, disability, and retaliation.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Love v. Potter, No. CA-02-498 (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2003).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.