John B. Kimble v. Midfirst Bank

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1037
JOHN B. KIMBLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
KAY J. KIMBLE,
Plaintiff,
versus
MIDFIRST BANK; AARON R. CARUSO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-
02-3869-PJM)
Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 28, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John B. Kimble, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
John B. Kimble appeals the district court’s orders dismissing
his petition for injunctive relief for lack of diversity
jurisdiction and denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Kimble v. Midfirst Bank, No. CA-02-3869-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2002;
filed Dec. 20, 2002, & entered Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --