Joseph Hart, Jr v. the Fisher Law Group (plcc)

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1031
JOSEPH HART, JR.; MARY F. HART, Wife,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
THE FISHER LAW GROUP (PLCC), ET AL,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-02-
4175-MJG)
Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Hart, Jr., Mary F. Hart, Appellants Pro Se. Martin Stuart
Goldberg, THE FISHER LAW GROUP, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph and Mary Hart appeal from the district court’s order
dismissing their complaint sua sponte for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. We also deny Appellants’ motion for
the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --