The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
03-1025•Ralph Matthews v. THOMAS E. WHITE, Secretary of the Department of the Army
03-1025Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1025
RALPH MATTHEWS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS E. WHITE, Secretary of the Department
of the Army,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-02-568-A)
Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ralph Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ralph Matthews appeals the district court’s order entering
partial judgment in favor of the Defendant on his racial
discrimination claim and dismissing Matthews’ retaliation, hostile
work environment, and wrongful termination claims, in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Matthews v. White, No. CA-02-
568-A (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 12, 2002; entered Nov. 15, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.