The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7901•United States of America v. Willie L. Boston, Iii
02-7901Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7901
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIE L. BOSTON, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (CR-99-98, CA-00-962)
Submitted: March 12, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie L. Boston, III, Appellant Pro Se. OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie L. Boston, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s
May 31, 2002, order and judgment accepting the magistrate judge’s
May 2, 2001, report and recommendation and denying relief on
Boston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and the district court’s
October 21, 2002, order denying Boston’s motion for reconsideration
and non-publication. We have independently reviewed the record and
cannot conclude that reasonable jurists would find the district
court’s rulings debatable. Accordingly, we grant Boston’s pending
motion for non-publication of this Court’s opinion, deny a
certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c) (2000); Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003 WL
431659, at *11 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.