The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7898•Israel Hidalgo v. United States of America
02-7898Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 5, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7898
ISRAEL HIDALGO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DAN DOVE, Warden
Federal Correctional Institution Edgefield,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-02-2242)
Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 5, 2003
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Israel Hidalgo, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Israel Hidalgo, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hidalgo
v. United States, No. CA-02-2242 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.