The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7896•Ricardo Brown v. ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden, F.M.C. Butner, North Carolina
02-7896Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7896
RICARDO BROWN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden, F.M.C. Butner, North
Carolina,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-02-HC-545-5-H)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003
Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricardo Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricardo Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motions for a writ of habeas
corpus and oral argument, and affirm the dismissal of his petition
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Beeler,
No. CA-02-HC-545-5-H (E.D.N.C., filed Sept. 11, 2002; entered
Sept. 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.