The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7855•United States of America v. Richard S. Fowler
02-7855Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7855
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RICHARD S. FOWLER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-
94-216)
Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard S. Fowler, Appellant Pro Se. Odessa Palmer Jackson, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard S. Fowler appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Fowler,
No. CR-94-216 (D. Md. Oct. 22, 2002). We grant the motion to file
an addendum to the informal brief and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.