Charles Patrick Mamanus v. Ronald J. Angelone

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7828
CHARLES PATRICK MAMANUS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE; MAJOR REDMAN; LIEUTENANT
BOYERS; D. CAMPBELL, Lieutenant; ASSISTANT
WARDEN HOLLER; ASSISTANT WARDEN DAY; L. M.
SAUNDERS; L. W. HUFFMAN; SERGEANT SAMPSON; M.
PETERS; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RIDGEWAY; OFFICER
BURDETTE; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SNEAD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District
Judge. (CA-02-817-7)
Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 6, 2003
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Patrick McManus, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Patrick McManus appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action.
The district court dismissed the complaint without prejudice
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). Because McManus may
amend his complaint to state a viable claim, the dismissal order is
not final and thus is not subject to appellate review. See Domino
Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67
(4th Cir. 1993).
We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument wold no
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --