The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7825•Maurice D. Buckner v. Kenneth K. Harper, individually
02-7825Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7825
MAURICE D. BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH K. HARPER, individually and in his
official capacity as Deputy Sheriff of Louisa
County; HENRY A. KENNON, individually and in
his official capacity as Sheriff of Louisa
County, Virginia; LOUISA COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR,
individually and in his/her official capacity
as Administrator of Louisa County, Virginia;
DIRECTOR, Albemarle-Charlottesville Joint
Security Complex, individually and in his/her
official capacity as Director; ALBEMARLE-
CHARLOTTESVILLE JOINT SECURITY COMPLEX;
MARGARET MCLEOD CAIN, individually and as
plaintiff’s former attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-1029-7)
Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 5, 2003
Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Maurice D. Buckner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Maurice D. Buckner appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint
for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Buckner
v. Harper, No. CA-02-1029-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.