Angel Sanchez v. CHARLES S. WALTERS, III, Superintendent

02-7824Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7824
ANGEL SANCHEZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES S. WALTERS, III, Superintendent,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-02-257-1)
Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 13, 2003
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Clark Fischer, RANDOLPH & FISCHER, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Angel Sanchez seeks to appeal the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We
have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the
district court that Sanchez has not made a substantial showing of
the denial of a constitutional right. See Sanchez v. Walters, No.
CA-02-257-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.