The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7786•Mario L. Ballard v. Chief of Virginia Department State Police
02-7786Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7786
MARIO L. BALLARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
CHIEF OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT STATE POLICE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-02-202)
Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 26, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mario L. Ballard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mario L. Ballard appeals the district court’s orders accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny Ballard’s
petition for writ of mandamus and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Ballard v. Chief of Va. Dep’t State Police, No. CA-02-
202 (E.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2002; Nov. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.