The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7765•United States of America v. John Calvin Pitts, a/k/a Johnny Pitts
02-7765Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 10, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7765
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JOHN CALVIN PITTS, a/k/a Johnny Pitts,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-98-70)
Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 10, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Calvin Pitts, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Smythers, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Calvin Pitts appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See United States v. Pitts, No. CR-98-70
(E.D. Va. Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.