The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7736•Nicholas Warner Jones v. United States Congress
02-7736Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 7, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7736
NICHOLAS WARNER JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES CONGRESS; BENSON EVERETT LEGG,
United States District Court of Maryland; THE
CHIEF JUDGE OF UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,
MARYLAND DISTRICT; CHAIRMAN OF MARYLAND PAROLE
COMMISSION; COMMISSIONER OF MARYLAND DIVISION
OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, Chief District Judge.
(CA-02-3322-L)
Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: January 7, 2003
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nicholas Warner Jones appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
on the reasoning of the district court. See Jones v. United States
Congress, No. CA-02-3322-L (D. Md. Oct. 30, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.