United States of America v. Norvell Webster Crump

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7694
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior
District Judge. (CR-94-101, CA-01-969)
Submitted: February 4, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norvell Webster Crump, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Norvell Webster Crump appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction to his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Crump, Nos. CR-94-101; CA-01-
969 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --