William S. Parker v. ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent

02-7650Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2003

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7650
WILLIAM S. PARKER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROY W. CHERRY, Superintendent; E. TAYLOR,
Captain; S. REEVES, Sergeant; A. WILLIS,
Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-02-1345-AM)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William S. Parker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
William S. Parker appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §
1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the
reasoning of the district court. See Parker v. Cherry, No. CA-02-
1345-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.