Willie Foster Sellers v. KENNETH E. MELSON, 1st Assistant United States Attorney

02-7639Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 12, 2003

Full text

* Judge Wilkins did not participate in consideration of this
case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 46(d) (2000).
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7639
WILLIE FOSTER SELLERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
KENNETH E. MELSON, 1st Assistant United States
Attorney; BARBARA WALKER, Assistant
Commonwealth Attorney; PAUL LANTEIGNE,
Sheriff; MARK MUSTIN, Chief Deputy; G. F.
DRISCOLL, Deputy Librarian,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-01-545-2)
Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Willie Foster Sellers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Parker, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Willie Foster Sellers appeals the district court’s orders
denying him relief in his action alleging violations under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Sellers v. Melson, No.
CA-01-545-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 2001; Sept. 23, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.