The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7613•United States of America v. Camille Ford
02-7613Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 2, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7613
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CAMILLE FORD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (CR-94-163, CA-98-1206)
Submitted: February 28, 2003 Decided: June 2, 2003
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Camille Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her
motion to reopen her previous § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Ford, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-
98-1206 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.