The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7604•United States of America v. James Edward Ellerbe
02-7604Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 12, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7604
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 02-7889
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (CR-97-100)
Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler,
Assistant United States Attorney, Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a court order, denying his supplemental
motion for a court order, denying his second supplemental motion
for a court order, and denying his motion for a downward departure.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See United
States v. Ellerbe, No. CR-97-100 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2002; filed
Nov. 5, 2002 & entered Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.