The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7570•United States of America v. Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr
02-7570Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7570
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LENZIE LEE MURRAY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CR-96-157)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lenzie Lee Murray, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion to Petition Unconstitutional Imposed Sentence
Pursuant to Ring v. Arizona.” We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning stated
by the district court. See United States v. Murray, No. CR-96-157
(E.D. Va. filed Sept. 26, 2002 & entered Sept. 27, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.