Douglas Lee Husketh v. Theodis Beck

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7552
DOUGLAS LEE HUSKETH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THEODIS BECK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-02-465-5-H)
Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 24, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Lee Husketh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Lee Husketh appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying
his motion to void that judgment. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Husketh v. Beck, No. CA-02-465-5-H
(E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 26, 2002, entered Aug. 27, 2002; Sept. 17,
2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --