D’andre Loverture Jackson v. Doctor Tatro

02-7551Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7551
D’ANDRE LOVERTURE JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR TATRO; DOCTOR THOMPSON; H. HAMILTON,
RDA; NURSE HARBER, LPN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District
Judge. (CA-02-928-7)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
D’Andre Loverture Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
D’Andre Loverture Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Jackson’s motion
to amend his informal brief and affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Jackson v. Tatro, No. CA-02-928-7 (W.D. Va.
Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.