Leopold F. Lamont v. United States of America

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7534
LEOPOLD F. LAMONT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (CR-96-101-V)
Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 1, 2003
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leopold F. Lamont, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Leopold F. Lamont appeals from the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his Fed. R.
Crim. P. 35(b) motion for a downward departure based on his
substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Lamont v. United States, No. CR-96-101-V
(W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 25, 2002; entered Sept. 26, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --