The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7464•Jerry B. Jackson v. E. B. PETERSON, Officer 664
02-7464Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 4, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7464
JERRY B. JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
E. B. PETERSON, Officer #664; J. W. HETRICK,
Officer #1472; L. G. SELL, Officer #1812; J.
E. KELLY, Officer #1747; C. W. WETHERELL,
Officer #894; H. D. MCKINNEY, Officer #1476;
UNKNOWN OFFICER, #896,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief
District Judge. (CA-02-306-3-1-MU)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 4, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jerry Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing
without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jackson v.
Peterson, No. CA-02-306-3-1-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 16, 2002 &
entered Sept. 19, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.