The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7355•United States of America v. Courtney Hugh Walker, a/k/a Gary Walker
02-7355Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7355
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
COURTNEY HUGH WALKER, a/k/a Gary Walker,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Frank W. Bullock, Jr.,
District Judge. (CR-94-18)
Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Courtney Hugh Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Courtney H. Walker appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to amend his criminal judgment. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Walker, No.
CR-94-18 (M.D.N.C. July 29, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.