United States of America v. David Zebrowski, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a Mad Dog, a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a David E.…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7277
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DAVID ZEBROWSKI, a/k/a Dog, a/k/a Mad Dog,
a/k/a Lewis Brady, a/k/a David E. Stewart,
a/k/a Eric Smith,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CR-96-41, CA-98-350)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Zebrowski, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, David John
Novak, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Zebrowski seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure and his motion seeking reconsideration. Insofar as
Zebrowski raises issues in his Rule 60(b) motion concerning claims
raised in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, we find Zebrowski did
not show extraordinary circumstances warranting granting the Rule
60(b) motion filed approximately three years after the denial of
his § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we conclude that Zebrowski has not
made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --