The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7273•Eddie Lee Taylor v. Marion County Detention Center
02-7273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7273
EDDIE LEE TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARION COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; CAPTAIN PACE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(CA-01-4118-9)
Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 20, 2002
Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Lee Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Jay Hupfer, WILLCOX, BUYCK &
WILLIAMS, P.A., Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Lee Taylor appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Taylor v. Marion County
Detention Ctr., No. CA-01-4118-9 (D.S.C. July 31, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.