The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7239•Timothy Smith v. HOUSTON SHIFLETT, Support Unit Manager
02-7239Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7239
TIMOTHY SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOUSTON SHIFLETT, Support Unit Manager;
JOHN/JANE DOE, Records Office Manager; J. K.
VAUGHAN, SR., Hearing Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
(CA-02-549)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Smith, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2002)
complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 2000). We have
reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Shiflett, CA-02-
549 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.