James A. Butler v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . 2…

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7237
JAMES A. BUTLER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. E. GUNJA, Health Services, Health
Administrator; FORSTER, PA; SMITH, PA;
KATHLEEN H. HAWK; JOHN DOE, sued in his
individual and official capacity; JANE DOE,
sued in her individual and official capacity;
ELAYAN; D. MILLER; T. MILLER; R. COSGROVE;
LIEUTENANT GREY; D. WILLIAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-3770-WMN)
Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 26, 2003
Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United
States Attorney, Nadira Clarke, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

-- 1 of 2 --

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his Bivens* claim. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Butler v. Gunja, No. CA-01-3770-WMN (D. Md.
June 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --