The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7235•James A. Butler v. JOHNSON; T. S. MILLER; R. COSGROVE; L. LONG; K. COX; K. H. HAWKS; J. E. GUNJA, Warden
02-7235Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 6, 2003
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7235
JAMES A. BUTLER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
V. JOHNSON; T. S. MILLER; R. COSGROVE; L.
LONG; K. COX; K. H. HAWKS; J. E. GUNJA,
Warden,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-01-2345-WMN)
Submitted: January 31, 2003 Decided: March 6, 2003
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael DiBiagio, United
States Attorney, Nadira Clark, Special Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of the Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Butler v.
Johnson, No. CA-01-2345-WMN (D. Md. June 10, 2002). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.