The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7216•Calvin Angelo Coward v. D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden
02-7216Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 3, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7216
CALVIN ANGELO COWARD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. SCOTT DODRILL, Warden; UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
Judge. (CA-01-398-5-HO)
Submitted: October 31, 2002 Decided: December 3, 2002
Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Calvin Angelo Coward, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Calvin Coward, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000), and the district court’s order denying his Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 59(e) motion to amend. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Coward v.
Dodrill, No. CA-01-398-5-HO (E.D.N.C. May 31, & July 5, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.