The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7172•Dwayne Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Department
02-7172Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 31, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7172
DWAYNE ANDERSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF FAIRMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOUGLAS
YOST, is sued in his individual and official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (CA-01-130-1)
Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002
Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Boyd Lee Warner, Susan Wilmerink
Gifford, WATERS, WARNER & HARRIS, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Anderson appeals the district court’s amended order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Dep’t, No. CA-01-130-1 (N.D.W.
Va. July 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.