The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7157•Robert W. Garrett v. GOODMAN, Investigator for Edgefield County Sheriff’s Department
02-7157Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 14, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7157
ROBERT W. GARRETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH E. COLLIER, Investigator for Edgefield
County Sheriff’s Department; MIKE V. GOODMAN,
Investigator for Edgefield County Sheriff’s
Department; ERVIN J. MAYE, Assistant
Solicitor, sued in their individual
capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1887-6-10AK)
Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 14, 2002
Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert W. Garrett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert W. Garrett appeals the district court’s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is
frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of
the district court. See Garrett v. Collier, No. CA-02-1887-6-10AK
(D.S.C. July 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.