The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7126•United States of America v. Carl Benit Cooper
02-7126Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7126
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CARL BENIT COOPER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Falcon B. Hawkins, Senior District
Judge. (CR-95-206)
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 21, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl Benit Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Lee Ellis Berlinsky, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Carl Benit Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cooper,
No. CR-95-206 (D.S.C. filed July 15, 2002; entered July 16, 2002).
We deny Cooper’s motion for general relief. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.