The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7081•United States of America v. Donald Wardrick
02-7081Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 6, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7081
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DONALD WARDRICK,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR-
95-294, CA-99-3381-PJM)
Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: November 6, 2002
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leonard L. Long, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. David Ira
Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Wardrick appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion filed under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Wardrick, Nos. CR-95-294; CA-
99-3381-PJM (D. Md. June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.