The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7057•United States of America v. James Leonardo Powell
02-7057Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 9, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7057
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JAMES LEONARDO POWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District
Judge. (CR-99-24-FO)
Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002
Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Leonardo Powell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
James Leonardo Powell appeals the district court’s order
denying his request for an extension of time to file a 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255 (2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.
Powell, No. CR-99-24-FO (E.D.N.C. filed June 7, 2002 & entered June
10, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.