The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-7033•Jameel Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary Living Conditions But Didn’t (b.c.d.c.)
02-7033Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 30, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7033
JAMEEL WOODARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EVERYONE WHO COULD HAVE STOPPED MY UNSANITARY
LIVING CONDITIONS BUT DIDN’T (B.C.D.C.); WENDY
SHERROD; RALPH LOGAN; COMMISSIONER FLANAGAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-01-2465-AW)
Submitted: September 19, 2002 Decided: September 30, 2002
Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jameel Woodard, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn Todd Marrow, Assistant
Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jameel Woodard appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Woodard v. Everyone Who Could Have Stopped My Unsanitary
Living Conditions But Didn’t (B.C.D.C.), No. CA-01-2465-AW (D. Md.
June 3, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.