The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6997•Aubrey D. Scott v. Dr. James Lee, M.d
02-6997Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 17, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6997
AUBREY D. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. JAMES LEE, M.D.; DR. GERALO JORDON,
Surgeon; DR. LEONARD J. WEIRETER, Surgeon,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 02-7004
AUBREY D. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DR. JAMES LEE, M.D.; DR. GERALO JORDON,
Surgeon; DR. LEONARD J. WEIRETER, Surgeon,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (CA-01-757-3)
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Submitted: October 10, 2002 Decided: October 17, 2002
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aubrey D. Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Aubrey D. Scott appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See Scott v. Lee, No. CA-01-757-3 (E.D. Va. May 30, 2002).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.