The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
02-6990•Carl Kofi Mayers v. TOMMIE SMITH, Officer, acting in his individual capacity
02-6990Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 23, 2002
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6990
CARL KOFI MAYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TOMMIE SMITH, Officer, acting in his
individual capacity and under color of law;
JOHN DOE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party in Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief
District Judge. (CA-00-1961-AM)
Submitted: September 12, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
Carl Kofi Mayers, Appellant Pro Se. Steven E. Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Carl Kofi Mayers appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaint against two federal correctional officers
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2000). We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mayers v.
Smith, No. CA-00-1961-AM (E.D. Va. April 4 2002; May 29, 2002). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.