United States of America v. George Arthur Dodge, Iii

02-6973Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2002

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6973
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GEORGE ARTHUR DODGE, III,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CR-98-2-ALL, CA-00-82)
Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 29, 2002
Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Arthur Dodge, III, Appellant Pro Se. Michael D. Stein,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia;
Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George Arthur Dodge, III seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
district court. See United States v. Dodge, Nos. CR-98-2-ALL; CA-
00-82 (N.D.W. Va. June 4, 2002). We deny Dodge’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.